A/HRC/WGEID/126/1 Rwanda Information from the Government 115. On 7 February 2022, the Government of Rwanda transmitted information concerning three cases, but the information was considered insufficient to clarify the cases. 116. In accordance with its methods of work, a copy of the case of Cassien Ntamuhanga was transmitted to the Government of Mozambique. Joint urgent appeal 117. On 5 November 2021, the Working Group transmitted, jointly with other special procedure mechanisms, an urgent appeal concerning acts of intimidation and reprisals against Noël Zihabamwe and persons associated with him, following the démarches undertaken to search for and establish the fate and whereabouts of his brothers, Antoine Zihabamwe and Jean Nsengimana, who were forcibly disappeared.40 Saudi Arabia Urgent procedure 118. Under its urgent procedure, the Working Group transmitted a case to the Government concerning Al-Sadhan Abdulrahman, allegedly last seen in court on 5 October 2021 after the Special Court of Appeals confirmed his 20-year term of imprisonment, followed by a 20year travel ban. Application of the six-month rule 119. The Government provided information, on the basis of which the Working Group decided to apply the six-month rule to the above-mentioned case concerning Al-Sadhan Abdulrahman. Clarification based on information from sources 120. On the basis of information provided by sources, the Working Group decided to clarify two cases concerning Abdulaziz bin Salman bin Mohammed Al Saud and Salman bin Abdulaziz bin Salman Al Saud, who are currently detained in a private villa in Riyadh. Information from sources 121. Sources provided updated information on an outstanding case, but the information was considered insufficient to clarify it. On the basis of the information received, the Working Group decided to transfer the case from the records of Saudi Arabia to those of Jordan. Observation 122. The Working Group wishes to recall that under article 10 of the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, any person deprived of liberty is to be held in an officially recognized place of detention and, in conformity with national law, be brought before a judicial authority promptly after detention. In addition, the fact that the Working Group declares a case clarified does not exonerate the Government concerned from its obligations under the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance to, inter alia, further investigate the case, bring the perpetrators to justice, provide adequate compensation to the family of the disappeared person and take all measures necessary to prevent similar cases from occurring in the future. 40 See RWA 2/2021. See also A/HRC/WGEID/125/1, para. 117. 19